Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Med Sci Monit ; 29: e939797, 2023 May 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2318857

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND The Indonesian Chronic Disease Management Program (PROLANIS) is a government program that aims to improve the health outcomes of patients with chronic diseases, including hypertension. This preliminary study aimed to evaluate the impacts of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the health outcomes of hypertension patients in rural areas who were enrolled in PROLANIS. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study used data from 4 PROLANIS groups in East Java province. The data were collected from participants' 6-month evaluations at 3 time points: before the COVID-19 pandemic in December 2019 (T0), during the COVID-19 pandemic in June 2020 (T1), and in December 2020 (T2). Evaluated parameters were body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipid (LDL), high-density lipid (HDL), triglyceride (TG), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). RESULTS There were 91 patients included in the analyses. Compared to T0, BMI, blood pressure, eGFR, and TC had significantly deteriorated at T1, but LDL, HDL, and TG showed no marked changes. At T2, BMI, DBP, and TC were similar to T0. On the other hand, SBP and eGFR did not improve, while HDL significantly deteriorated. Stratified based on age, worsening of DBP, TC, and LDL at T1 and eGFR at T1 and T2 was only observed in those aged 60 years and older. CONCLUSIONS This preliminary study showed that the health outcomes of hypertension patients in rural areas who were enrolled in PROLANIS were negatively impacted during the COVID-19 pandemic, with the elderly being the most affected.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hypertension , Aged , Humans , Middle Aged , Indonesia/epidemiology , Pandemics , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension/therapy , Triglycerides , Blood Pressure/physiology , Disease Management , Cholesterol, HDL
2.
Med Educ Online ; 28(1): 2182665, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2285640

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Social restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic have shifted most learning methods into online courses, especially for medical skills education. However, the effects of online courses on medical skill education amongst medical students are still arguable. The study aims to analyse medical students' knowledge, attitude, practice and satisfaction towards medical skills between online and offline courses. METHOD: We performed a case-control study conducted among 533 medical students with online (as a case group, n = 288) and offline courses (as a control group, n = 245). We evaluated three fundamental medical skills, including history taking [HT], lung physical examination [LPE], and heart physical examination [HPE]. We tested the knowledge and skills among students through theory and practical examinations. Students' attitudes and satisfaction were assessed using a validated questionnaire. RESULTS: The scores for knowledge and practical skills among the online group were significantly higher (p = 0.016, p = 0.004, respectively). In comparison, the scores for the students' attitudes and satisfaction were substantially lower (p = 0.000, p = 0.003, respectively) compared to the control group. Most of the students in both groups passed the exam (case vs. control = 81.94%; 83.27%, respectively). Males were the only factor associated with a higher rate of passing the examination (OR 0.42, 95% CI [0.27-0.67], p = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: Online learning could be an alternative approach on improving student's knowledge and practice towards medical skill especially amidst COVID-19 pandemic, however further consideration on student's attitude and satisfaction are mandatory to achieve appropriate competence as future general practitioner.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Education, Distance , Students, Medical , Male , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Pandemics
3.
Med Sci Monit ; 29: e938892, 2023 Feb 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2233875

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and mental health worldwide. However, its impact on medical students in Indonesia has not been well documented. This study aimed to evaluate HRQoL and mental health in 729 Indonesian medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional study from 31 August to 30 September 2021. The study instrument was an online questionnaire that was distributed via social media platforms. The 12-item short form version 2 (SF12v2) was used to measure HRQoL, and the 21-item Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21) was used to measure mental health. RESULTS From 729 Indonesian medical students included in the analyses, 37.3% had impaired physical component and 66.9% had impaired mental component of HRQoL. The determinants were medical students' island of residence, history of hospitalization, and family member's hospitalization and death due to COVID-19. Concerning mental health, the prevalence of reported symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress were 45.4%, 65.2%, and 60.9%, respectively. Sex, study method, grade, previous COVID-19 disease severity, comorbidities, previous learning experience, and history of family isolation were identified as the determinants of mental health. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the adverse effects of COVID-19 on HRQoL and mental health in Indonesian medical students. The results identified key associations, including SARS-CoV-2 infection and comorbidities experienced by the students, the health of their families, including grief following bereavement, and the effects of social isolation during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Students, Medical , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Mental Health , Pandemics , Indonesia/epidemiology , Quality of Life , SARS-CoV-2 , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/psychology , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/psychology
4.
Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care ; 26(4):535-545, 2022.
Article in English | Academic Search Complete | ID: covidwho-2026668

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 cases in Indonesia seemed to be increasing by each passing day at the time of writing this review, more positive cases discovered than the recovered ones. With the highest rank within all ASEAN countries, and also a home of many variants of COVID-19, Indonesia had become a break off destination to others. Along with the problem associated with the pandemic, which all people had to face, the purpose of this review is to elaborate the use of convalescent plasma therapy on treatment against COVID-19, especially its different variants. We overview the evidence that we obtained from several databases using specific keywords. A large amount of evidence points out that the convalescent plasma therapy has shown a promising outcome against COVID-19 infection, as it did for infectious diseases. Although in COVID-19 variants of concern, convalescent plasma therapy showed a reduction in neutralization ~ 3-fold against P.1, and 7-13 folds against B.1.351 variant, it still can be used as a treatment for COVID-19 and its variants. Abbreviations: PPE - personal protective equipment;VoC - Variants of concern;VoI - Variants of interest;CPT - convalescent plasma therapy;RBD - receptor-binding domain;ARDS - Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome;ICU - Intensive Care Unit;IQR - Interquartile Range;RCT - Randomized Clinical Trial;RT-PCR - Reverse Transcriptase- Polymerase Chain Reaction;NAbs - neutralizing antibodies [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care is the property of Department of Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

5.
Arch Med Sci ; 18(5): 1169-1180, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2025070

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Rapid spread of COVID-19 has caused detrimental effects globally. Involvement of the ACE2 receptor has identified COVID-19 as a multi-organ disease. Preliminary studies have provided evidence that cardiac involvement, including right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) and pulmonary hypertension (PH), were found in COVID-19 cases, even in the non-advanced stage. This meta-analysis aims to analyze the prevalence of RVD and PH, and their association with COVID-19 clinical outcome. Material and methods: A systematic data search was conducted through PubMed, medRxiv, ProQuest, Science Direct, and Scopus databases using constructed keywords based on MeSH terms. Any outcomes regarding mortality, severity, ICU admission, and mechanical ventilation usage were analyzed using RevMan v.5.4 and Stata v.16. Results: A total of 16 eligible studies (1,728 patients) were included. Pooled prevalence of RVD in COVID-19 was 19% (95% CI: 13-25%), and PH was 22% (95% CI: 14-31%). RVD was associated with increased mortality (OR = 2.98 (95% CI: 1.50-5.89), p = 0.002), severity (OR = 3.61 (95% CI: 2.05-6.35), p < 0.001), ICU admission (OR = 1.70 (95% CI: 1.12-2.56), p = 0.01), and mechanical ventilation (MV) usage (OR = 1.60 (95% CI: 1.14-2.25), p = 0.007). PH was also associated with increased mortality (OR = 5.42 (95% CI: 2.66-11.060, p < 0.001), severity (OR = 5.74 (95% CI: 2.28-14.49), p < 0.001), and ICU admission (OR = 12.83 (95% CI: 3.55-46.41), p < 0.001). Conclusions: RVD and PH were prevalent in COVID-19 and associated with mortality, severity, ICU admission, and MV usage in COVID-19 patients. Bedside echocardiography examination could be considered as a novel risk stratification tool in COVID-19.

6.
PLoS One ; 17(1): e0262827, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1643285

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The potential role of medical students in raising awareness during public health emergencies has been acknowledged. To further explore their potentials as public educators and role models for the communities during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, this study aims to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice of these students toward COVID-19. METHODS: An online cross-sectional survey was conducted among undergraduate medical students in Indonesia. Socio-demographics characteristics, social interaction history, information-seeking behavior, as well as knowledge, attitude, and practice toward COVID-19 were collected through a self-reported questionnaire. A p-value of <0.05 indicated statistical significance. RESULTS: Out of 4870 respondents, 64.9% had positive attitude and 51.5% had positive practice toward COVID-19, while only 29.8% had adequate knowledge. Knowledge was slightly positively correlated with attitude and practice (ρ = 0.074 and ρ = 0.054, respectively; both p<0.001), while attitude was weakly correlated with practice (ρ = 0.234, p<0.001). Several factors including age, sex, place of residence, institution type, academic level, family income, history of chronic illness, prior volunteering experience, and perceptual awareness on COVID-19 were significantly associated with either knowledge, attitude, and/or practice toward COVID-19. Furthermore, health institution's and the government's press releases, as well as health expert opinions were deemed as the most reliable sources of COVID-19-related information-yet trivially none of these sources were associated with knowledge, attitude, and practice in the study population. CONCLUSION: Many undergraduate medical students in Indonesia had positive attitude and practice against COVID-19, yet only a few had adequate knowledge. This warrants further interventions to keep them updated with COVID-19 evidence to maximize their potentials in raising public awareness on COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/psychology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Social Perception/psychology , Students, Medical/psychology , Age Factors , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Female , Humans , Indonesia/epidemiology , Male , Sex Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Universities , Young Adult
7.
Diabetes Metab Syndr ; 15(5): 102210, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1313054

ABSTRACT

AIMS: This meta-analysis aims to analyze the association of calcium channel blocker (CCB) use with COVID-19 clinical outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, ProQuest, Science Direct, Scopus, and medRxiv databases were searched systematically in a limited period. The primary outcome was mortality. RESULTS: A total of 119,298 patients from 31 eligible studies were included. Pooled analysis of the random-effect model revealed CCB was not associated with reduced mortality (OR = 1.21 [95%CI: 0.98-1.49], p = 0.08). Interestingly, subgroup analysis in hypertensive patients revealed significantly reduced mortality (OR = 0.69 [95%CI: 0.52-0.91], p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: CCB usage was not associated with the outcome of COVID-19. However, CCB was associated with a decreased mortality rate in hypertensive COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/mortality , Calcium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality , Prognosis , SARS-CoV-2/drug effects , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Virus Internalization/drug effects , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
8.
BMC Med Educ ; 21(1): 138, 2021 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1112433

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The question to involve or restrict medical students' involvement in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic response remains contentious. As their state of preparation and perceptions in volunteering during this pandemic have yet to be investigated, this study aims to evaluate Indonesian medical students' willingness to volunteer and readiness to practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A web-based survey was conducted among undergraduate medical students throughout Indonesia. Socio-demographic and social interaction information, in addition to willingness to volunteer and readiness to practice, were obtained using a self-reported questionnaire. The significance level was set at 5%. RESULTS: Among 4870 participants, 2374 (48.7%) expressed their willingness to volunteer, while only 906 (18.6%) had adequate readiness to practice. Male students, students with prior volunteering experience in health or non-health sectors, and students from public universities or living in Central Indonesia (vs Java) had higher scores of willingness and readiness to volunteer. Students from Sumatra also had better preparedness (odds ratio [OR] 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-2.12, p = 0.004), while the opposite occurred for students from Eastern Indonesia (OR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.44-0.89, p = 0.002)-when compared to students from Java. In addition, compared to students with high family income, students from lower-middle income families were less willing to volunteer (OR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.59-0.98, p = 0.034), though those with low family income had better readiness (OR 1.51, 95% CI: 1.10-2.08, p = 0.011). Shortage of medical personnel, sense of duty, and solicitation by stakeholders were the main reasons increasing the students' willingness to volunteer; whereas contrarily fear for own's health, absence of a cure, and fear of harming patients were the primary factors diminishing their willingness to volunteer. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicated that many Indonesian medical students are willing to volunteer, yet only few of them were ready to practice, indicating that further preparations are required to maximize their potentials and minimize their exposure to hazards. We suggest that their potentials as a firm support system during the pandemic should not be overlooked, and that the integration of relevant courses to the medical curricula are imperative to prepare for future public health emergencies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Clinical Competence , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Motivation , Students, Medical/psychology , Volunteers , Curriculum , Fear , Female , Humans , Income , Indonesia , Male , Pandemics , Residence Characteristics , SARS-CoV-2 , Self Report , Sex Factors , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL